[]
Stanley Kubrick'in the shining filmi ile ilgili bir soru
spoiler spoiler spoiler spoiler spoiler
----------spoiler----------
filmde karısı Jack'i erzak bölümüne kapatıyor yha.Sonradan kapı kendi kendine açılıyor birkaç konuşma sonrası.Sizce hayaletler mi açıyor yoksa otelde onlardan canlı başka biri daha mı var ?
----------spoiler-----------
imza : uzun süredir aklına takılmış insan evladı
----------spoiler----------
filmde karısı Jack'i erzak bölümüne kapatıyor yha.Sonradan kapı kendi kendine açılıyor birkaç konuşma sonrası.Sizce hayaletler mi açıyor yoksa otelde onlardan canlı başka biri daha mı var ?
----------spoiler-----------
imza : uzun süredir aklına takılmış insan evladı
Who opened the pantry door?
Kubrick told Michel Ciment: "As the supernatural events occurred you searched for an explanation, and the most likely one seemed to be that the strange things that were happening would finally be explained as the products of Jack's imagination. It's not until Grady, the ghost of the former caretaker who axed to death his family, slides open the bolt of the larder door, allowing Jack to escape, that you are left with no other explanation but the supernatural. [...]Stephen Crane wrote a story called "The Blue Hotel." In it you quickly learn that the central character is a paranoid. He gets involved in a poker game, decides someone is cheating him, makes an accusation, starts a fight and gets killed. You think the point of the story is that his death was inevitable because a paranoid poker player would ultimately get involved in a fatal gunfight. But, in the end, you find out that the man he accused was actually cheating him. I think The Shining uses a similar kind of psychological misdirection to forestall the realisation that the supernatural events are actually happening.."
GS disagrees he says, "Stanley was very careful here NOT to make this rely on a supernatural explanation. All we hear is the SOUND of Grady's voice and the bolt being released, which could easily be Jack's imagination. We never see how Jack gets out of the larder. The supernatural explanation is only one of several possibilities. It is possible that Jack broke his way out in some way i.e. in a rage managed to lever the door open, or that Wendy had not locked the door properly (even though she appears to earlier) BUT we don't see her padlock it properly. I think Kubrick wants the supernatural explanation, but he does NOT want the audience to see the door being opened on film
Kubrick told Michel Ciment: "As the supernatural events occurred you searched for an explanation, and the most likely one seemed to be that the strange things that were happening would finally be explained as the products of Jack's imagination. It's not until Grady, the ghost of the former caretaker who axed to death his family, slides open the bolt of the larder door, allowing Jack to escape, that you are left with no other explanation but the supernatural. [...]Stephen Crane wrote a story called "The Blue Hotel." In it you quickly learn that the central character is a paranoid. He gets involved in a poker game, decides someone is cheating him, makes an accusation, starts a fight and gets killed. You think the point of the story is that his death was inevitable because a paranoid poker player would ultimately get involved in a fatal gunfight. But, in the end, you find out that the man he accused was actually cheating him. I think The Shining uses a similar kind of psychological misdirection to forestall the realisation that the supernatural events are actually happening.."
GS disagrees he says, "Stanley was very careful here NOT to make this rely on a supernatural explanation. All we hear is the SOUND of Grady's voice and the bolt being released, which could easily be Jack's imagination. We never see how Jack gets out of the larder. The supernatural explanation is only one of several possibilities. It is possible that Jack broke his way out in some way i.e. in a rage managed to lever the door open, or that Wendy had not locked the door properly (even though she appears to earlier) BUT we don't see her padlock it properly. I think Kubrick wants the supernatural explanation, but he does NOT want the audience to see the door being opened on film
- radikalherif
(13.10.08 02:53:50)
çocuk açıyor... otelin etkisiyle.
- mortifera (13.10.08 11:29:49)
1
