[]
su tam olarak ne anlama geliyor
The "but for" rule means that if the result would not have occurred but for the defendant's actions, then the defendant can be found guilty. It is known as factual causation. The usual case to demonstrate this is that of White [1910], in which White put cyanide in his mother's drink. However, she had only taken a few sips when she dropped down dead of an unrelated heart attack. White could not be found guilty of murder because it could not be said that, but for his actions, his mother would not have died.
suça teşebbüs değil miydi düşününce.
- hocam fazla egon var mi
(21.10.12 17:31:05)
eksik teşebbüs anlatılıyor. Örne dava olarak da 1910 tarihli white davası örnek verilmiş. Adam annesinin içkisine siyanür koymuş ama annesi siyanürden zehirlenmeden önce kalp krizi geçirmiş. Cinayetle suçlanamayacağı ama teşebbüs olmamış gibi davranılamayacağı döylenmiş.
- lpgli tosbaga (21.10.12 17:40:16)
1
